SPECIES IMPORTANCE

Yellowfin tuna is a globally important commercial species. It accounts for more than a quarter of the world’s tuna catch. More than 70% of the world yellowfin tuna catch is taken from the Western and Central Pacific and Indian oceans.

Currently, about 0.9 million t of yellowfin tuna are harvested from the Asia-Pacific: about 0.5 million tonnes (t) from the Western and Central Pacific Ocean (WCPO) (valued at just over US$0.5 billion) and nearly 0.4 million t from the Indian Ocean (IO). Yellowfin tuna comprises nearly a fifth of the total tuna catch of the WCPO and nearly half (about 44%) of the IO tuna catch.

The main production areas are the western equatorial belt of the WCPO and in the north IO and to the west of Madagascar.

FISHING METHODS

In its oceanic environmental range, (see Biology), yellowfin tuna is caught by local and foreign licensed fishing vessels using a wide range of fishing gears of artisanal, semi-industrial, industrial and recreational types. Surface-oriented fishing methods such as purse seines and gillnets catch a wide size range of yellowfin tuna (juvenile and adult fish), whereas the deeper fishing methods such as longline and handline take mainly adult fish. In purse-seine sets on free schools (not associated with fish aggregating devices (FADs)), yellowfin dominate in the Indian Ocean, but form a minor component of such schools in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean, where skipjack typically dominate. However, free-swimming schools of large yellowfin tuna are sometimes present in the WCPO.

The tuna fishing fleets of developing countries are very diverse and range from coastal and artisanal, through semi-industrial to industrial-scale vessels; developed country fleets are industrial scale and much less diverse.

In the WCPO, yellowfin tuna is caught by purse-seine nets, handline, longline, pole-and-line and troll line. In the IO, yellowfin tuna is caught by purse seine, longline, gill nets, pole-and-line, handline, troll line and sundry other artisanal gear. A substantial amount of juvenile yellowfin tuna is taken off Indonesia, in particular off Sumatra, using various types of artisanal gears, in particular liftnets.

In both ocean areas, the relative importance of the different gears used for yellowfin tuna has shifted over recent decades. In particular, purse seine fishing has increased in importance; considerable quantities of yellowfin tuna are now caught by purse-seine fleets fishing for free schools or targeting skipjack tuna around fish aggregating devices (FADs) and other floating objects. In the Indian Ocean fishing with artisanal and semi-industrial gears have increased in some coastal countries including coastal longlines and handlines in Maldives, India, Indonesia, and other countries, and the liftnet fisheries referred to above.

SMALL-SCALE AND INDUSTRIAL-SCALE FISHERIES

Since the early 1990s in both the WCPO and IO, the share of the yellowfin catch by vessels from distant water countries has declined, while catches by coastal States, using industrial gear such as purse seine and longline, as well as a variety of artisanal gear, has increased rapidly.

RECREATIONAL FISHING

Yellowfin tuna is a popular recreational species for game-fishing (angling) clubs in many countries bordering the Pacific and Indian oceans. The annual recreational angling catch of yellowfin tuna just from New South Wales (eastern Australia) is between 50 and 350 tonnes.

AQUACULTURE

Yellowfin tuna is not produced in aquaculture, although the technology for producing the species in captivity has been developed.

GUIDE TO FURTHER READING

Note: Details of all sources are given in References below.

For importance of species and catch information, see ISSF Stock Status Report, WCPFC (2014a, 2014b), Shelton Harley and colleagues (2015), IOTC Stock Status Dashboard.

For overview of tuna fishing, see Makoto Peter Miyake and colleagues (2010).

For fleets and fishing methods for yellowfin tuna in the WCPO, see John Hampton & Peter Williams (2011a, 2011b), Peter Williams & Peter Terawasi (2014), and Shelton Harley and colleagues (2015). For fleet size dynamics, see Kate Barclay & Ian Cartwright (2007). For FAD fishing in Indonesia and Philippines, see Ricardo Barbaran (2006). For data corrections, see John Hampton & Peter Williams (2011a), and Tim Lawson (2010). For guides and handbooks to the identification of yellowfin and bigeye tuna, from fresh to frozen and damaged, see the Secretariat for the Pacific Community FAME Digital Library, and enter "yellowfin" AND "David Itano" (author) into the search boxes to obtain the guides, many in several languages.

For the Indian Ocean IOTC catches, see Stock Status Dashboard summary, M. Renaud Pianet and colleagues (2011), IOTC (2014). For IO fishing capacity, see Guillermo Moreno & Miguel Herrera (2013). For Maldives fisheries, see M. Shiham Adam & A. Riyaz Jauharee (2009).

For recreational fishing statistics in New South Wales, see I & I NSW (2010). For game fishing information on yellowfin tuna, see International Game Fish Association.

REFERENCES

• Adam, MS & AR Jauharee. 2009. Handline large yellowfin tuna fishery of the Maldives. Indian Ocean Tuna Commission 10th Session of the Working Party on Tropical Tunas, Mombasa, Kenya, 15-23 October 2009, Working Paper 15. 14 p.
• Babaran, RP. 2006. Payao fishing and its impacts to tuna stocks. A preliminary analysis. Western & Central Pacific Fisheries Commission, 2nd Scientific Committee Regular Session, 7-18 August 2006, Manila, Philippines, Paper FT-WP 7. 13 p.
• Barclay, K & I Cartwright. 2007. Governance of tuna industries: The key to economic viability and sustainability in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean. Marine Policy 31: 348–358.
• Hampton, J & P Williams. 2011a. Misreporting of purse seine catches of skipjack and yellowfin-bigeye on logsheets. WCPFC Scientific Committee Seventh Regular Session, 9-17 August 2011, Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia. Paper T-WP-02. 11 p.
• Hampton, J & P Williams. 2011b. Analysis of purse seine set type behaviour in 2009 and 2010. WCPFC Scientific Committee Seventh Regular Session, 9-17 August 2011, Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia. Paper MI-WP-01. 18 p.
• I. & I. NSW (Industry & Investment NSW Government). 2010. Yellowfin tuna, pp 377-379, In Status of Fisheries Resources in NSW, 2008/09, Wild Fisheries Research Program.
• IOTC (Indian Ocean Tuna Commission). 2014. Status of the Indian Ocean yellowfin tuna (YFT: Thunnus albacares) resource. IOTC Stock Status Dashboard. 20 p.
• Lawson, T. 2010. Update on the estimation of selectivity bias based on paired spill and grab samples collected by observers on purse seiners in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean. Sixth Regular Session of the Scientific Committee of the Western and Central Fisheries Commission, 10-19 August 2010, Nuku’alofa, Tonga. Working Paper SC6-WP02. 19 p.
• Miyake, MP, P Guillotreau, CH Sun, & G Ishimura. 2010. Recent developments in the tuna industry: stocks, fisheries, management, processing, trade and markets. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper. No.543. Rome, FAO. 125 p.
• Moreno, G. & M Herrera. 2013. Estimation of fishing capacity by tuna fishing fleets in the Indian Ocean. Report presented at the 16th Session of the Scientific Committee of the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission. Busan, Republic of Korea, 2–6 December 2013. IOTC–2013–SC16–INF04.
• Pianet R, A Delgado de Molina, P Dewals, V Lucas, L Floch, E Chassot, & J Ariz. 2011. Statistics of the main purse seine fleets fishing in the Indian Ocean (1981-2010). Thirteenth Session of the IOTC Working Party on Tropical Tunas. Lankanfinolhu, North Malé Atoll, Republic of Maldives, 16–23 October 2011. IOTC-2011-WPTT13-24 Rev_1. 30 p.
• WCPFC (Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission). 2014a. Summary Report of the Tenth regular session of the Scientific Committee. Majuro, Republic of the Marshall Islands, 6-14 August 2014, 229 p.
• WCPFC (Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission). 2014b. Summary Report of the Eleventh Regular Session. Apia, Samoa, 1-5 December 2014.
• Williams, P & P Terawasi. 2014. Overview of tuna fisheries in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean, including economic conditions – 2013. WCPFC Scientific Committee Tenth Regular Session, 6-14 August 2014, Majuro, Republic of Marshall Islands. WCPFC-SC10-2014/GN WP-1. 60 p.

Yellowfin tuna is traded in many forms including small whole fresh fish for local wet markets, small and large frozen fish from industrial purse seiners for loining, canning and higher value specialty markets, large frozen or fresh fish from longliners and handliners, flown or shipped to high value export markets for sashimi and steaks, and lower value derived products.

Changes in yellowfin tuna supply chains are driven by strong domestic and international markets especially in Japan, USA, Europe, Indonesia and Philippines, and technology developments that have improved on-board handling of fish in order to maximize its value.

POST HARVEST

Yellowfin tuna is processed for different markets on the basis of quality, size and method of capture (see Production). In local markets, small yellowfin tuna (e.g., in India, less than 50 cm in length) is sold mainly as whole fresh fish; large fish are sold as sashimi and steaks in urban and tourist centers. In international markets, yellowfin tuna is sold as whole frozen fish, loins, fresh, chilled fish and canned and pouched fish. More yellowfin tuna is sold in cans and pouches than as fresh, frozen or other products. Nearly every part of yellowfin tuna is used during processing and little is discarded.

FRESH AND FROZEN FISH AND BYPRODUCTS

Depending on available transport options, the quality and appearance of the fish flesh will determine the price and destination. Its quality depends largely on how it is caught and handled from the moment of landing on the fishing vessel. Grading of individual fish destined for high value sashimi markets, e.g. Japan, can take place at several points in the supply chain. Adult yellowfin tuna has red or pink flesh.

The higher grades of longline caught yellowfin tuna over about 20 kg round weight is sold mostly for sashimi and fresh-chilled products such as loins or steaks. Lower grades landed in some Philippine and Indonesian ports are treated with carbon monoxide (CO) and frozen for export. The USA is a major destination for CO-treated yellowfin. Several other jurisdictions including the EU and Japan prohibit its importation.

Large distant water longliners with super freezers operating at -55^o to -60^oC supply frozen yellowfin tuna to distant markets. The whole or gilled and gutted fish are frozen within minutes of landing on the vessel to maintain optimum quality. Small and medium scale offshore and coastal longliners utilize ice or refrigerated seawater to supply fresh tuna. Fresh yellowfin is sent to major markets in the EU, Japan and the USA from offloading ports with the required air freight capacity.

Yellowfin tuna caught by handline e.g. from Indonesian, Maldivian, Vietnam and Philippine fleets, is sold fresh chilled for sashimi to major domestic and international markets or may be frozen onshore where air freight is not a good option or where some processing into secondary products e.g., steaks and saku blocks occurs Yellowfin tuna caught by longline or handline but unsuitable for export markets is sold in domestic markets. In the more eastern areas of the Western and Central Pacific Ocean, purse seiners are catching increasing volumes of large yellowfin tuna, especially when fishing on non-FAD (unassociated) schools. To maximize value, the catch is often high graded by sorting on board or during transshipment, and good quality large fish sent to higher priced European (Spain, Italy) specialty markets or processed as cooked loins.

In the more eastern areas of the Western and Central Pacific Ocean, purse seiners are catching increasing volumes of large yellowfin tuna, especially when fishing on non-FAD (unassociated) schools. To maximize value, the yellowfin tuna catch by purse seiners is often sorted on board or during transshipment, and good quality large fish sent to higher priced European (Spain, Italy) specialty markets. Japanese purse seiners have the ability to freeze a certain portion of their larger yellowfin and bigeye tuna catch at ultra low temperatures and sell to the lower-end sashimi market in Japan. Worldwide, a few of the newer large purse seiners are being equipped with super freezers to likewise quickly freeze and hold the large yellowfin for higher value markets. Gillnets, that are increasingly important in the Indian Ocean, e.g., Sri Lanka, Pakistan and Iran fleets, provide fresh tuna, and in the case of some vessels, frozen yellowfin tuna, to domestic and foreign markets, depending upon the quality of fish achieved. The majority of the gillnet catch, however, is thought to go to local markets or possibly canning; its quality is often poor.

Various products are utilized from the processing of lower grade large yellowfin, particularly in Philippines, Vietnam and Indonesia. In decreasing order of value, these products include: tuna blocks or "saku blocks" of lower grade loin tuna often used in mass-produced sushi products; cubes of flesh (from loins) that are smaller pieces than a saku block; tuna chunks of meat lower in grade than sashimi; tuna cubes or "poke" cubes; tuna scrape meat (or "naokochi" scrape) consisting of small, odd sized pieces of meat pulled from the fish skeleton; tuna belly flaps; and opercula (gill covers). Most of these products are vacuum packed in plastic bags and frozen for easy transport. Most come in two forms, either bright red due to treatment by carbon monoxide, or darker if untreated. Heads, gills and offal are often rendered and used in fish meal for fertilizers or feed, or, in some South and Southeast Asian countries, used in fish head curry dishes. Bones are usually used for extraction of calcium and protein concentrate may be recovered from wash and cooking water. Fish oil is often another important by-product. Dark meat may be used in low value canned product or petfood.

CANNED AND POUCHED TUNA

Tuna sold in cans or pouches can be transported in their final form without refrigeration and are refeered to as ambient tuna.

Canned yellowfin tuna can be legally sold as “light meat tuna,” although other species (skipjack, longtail and bigeye tuna) and even bonito can also be labelled the same way in some markets.

Caught by purse seiners, frozen small yellowfin tuna are unloaded directly to canneries or transhipped on carrier vessels. Yellowfin tuna caught by purse seine in the Western and Central Pacific and Indian Oceans is canned or loined for canning elsewhere, as is skipjack tuna, in factories in Thailand, Seychelles, Mauritius, Madagascar, Kenya, China, India, Philippines, Indonesia, Vietnam, Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands, Fiji, Marshall Islands, American Samoa, and Costa Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, and Mexico.

At the cannery, the fish is sorted, headed and gutted, then cleaned before cooking and subsequently being processed into loins. Cooked loins may be packaged and frozen for canning elsewhere or placed into shelf-stable packages (cans or pouches) before cooking under pressure in a retort. Various additives or flavourings may be added to the cans before sealing and retorting. Tuna in pouches are more easily transported and require less packaging material than cans. Such products are slowly gaining consumer acceptance in major markets, Much of the large yellowfin tuna processed by Indian Ocean canneries is packed in the “raw pack” (tuna “au naturel” – in brine or oil) form preferred by the French market. In this method, raw fish is placed into a can, covered with brine or oil, sealed and cooked in an autoclave.

SALTED AND DRIED PRODUCTS

In the Indian Ocean, traditionally, Pakistan gillnetters supplied Sri Lanka with salted dried yellowfin tuna, but this has reduced in recent years in favour of selling to higher value markets in Iran and other Middle East countries.

In the Western and Central Pacific Ocean, yellowfin tuna is not used in salted and dried products.

COMMON MARKET NAMES

The FAO names for yellowfin tuna are: yellowfin tuna (English), thon albacore (French), and rabil (Spanish). Yellowfin tuna is also known by many local common names (e.g., see FishBase http://www.fishbase.org for lists) but, due to its large global market, is usually known also at country level as "yellowfin tuna." In the USA, the Hawaiian word for both yellowfin and bigeye tuna, "ahi," has been used as a marketing tool irrespective of fish origin and has gained general acceptance at the wholesale and retail level.

NUTRITIONAL VALUE

Yellowfin tuna is low in saturated fat and sodium and is a very good source of protein, thiamine, selenium, vitamin B6, and the health-benefitting omega-3 long-chain (containing 20 or more carbon atoms) polyunsaturated fatty acids.

Nutritional data for yellowfin tuna sourced from Australian, Eastern Pacific and Western Atlantic yellowfin tuna are as given below (per 100g of raw product):

Sources: NOAA FishWatch Pacific Yellowfin Tuna Table of Nutrition; Nichols et al. (1998),* Fishfiles (http://www.fishfiles.com.au/knowing/species/finfish/tuna-billfish/Pages/Yellowfin-Tuna.aspx)*, Burger and Gochfeld (2011) (for western Atlantic yellowfin tuna**

Top quality yellowfin tuna is desirable for use as sashimi and is also used in sushi in Japan and many other Asian countries. It is gaining popularity as sashimi and sushi in western countries where the more expensive bigeye tuna is either not available or uneconomical to use. Yellowfin is also served seared, grilled, broiled, sautéed, dried and smoked. In the Maldives and South Asian countries, it is used in several traditional products such as the cooked, smoked and sun-dried hikimas and Maldive fish.

MERCURY IN TUNA

The health and environmental risks of methylmercury accumulation in the tissues of predatory fish such as yellowfin tuna have received public and scientific attention. Methylmercury is a water soluble compound of mercury (a heavy metal) and has toxic biological impacts. The mercury content of yellowfin tuna, where it has been analysed, is generally well below the recommended Codex Alimentarius guideline (predatory fish species) of 1.0 mg mercury per kg of fish. The mercury content of yellowfin tuna varies with location, fish size and season and typically is lower than that in other tunas that are either longer lived or with higher fish diets, e.g., bigeye tuna and albacore. Large yellowfin tuna have the highest levels of mercury. In 2004 in Fiji, the average methylmercury levels in yellowfin tuna were 0.11 mg/kg.

The FAO/WHO Codex Committee on Contaminants in Food (CCCF) is reviewing the current guidelines, taking into account information on the benefits of fish consumption as well as the risks of mercury ingestion. Country and consumer specific advice needs to be specific to the risk of mercury exposure from the diet, depending on factors such as the patterns of fish consumption (types, sizes, frequency of consumption). Typically, dietary advice is given separately for children, women of child-bearing age and the general population.

In the Seychelles (Indian Ocean) where fish (including tuna) is consumed daily, a preliminary study of children to 9 years old found no consistent pattern of negative associations with prenatal methylmercury exposures. This suggested that the beneficial influence of nutrients from fish (including omega-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids, iodine, iron, and selenium) are generally considered to have far outweighed adverse effects of methylmercury on the developing nervous system of the children. Yellowfin tuna has a high selenium content relative to its mercury content, perhaps helping mitigate the impact of mercury on human health.

TRADE AND MARKETS

In the Western and Central Pacific and Indian Oceans, yellowfin tuna is a major food commodity of political and economic importance. It is harvested in large volumes; it has a wide range of valuable products and markets; and international fishing and market access arrangements have impacts on and beyond the fisheries sector.

Price premiums, the spread of technology such as on-board ultra low temperature (ULT) freezers and availability of air transport out of certain landing ports are delivering more fresh and frozen yellowfin tuna products into high value markets. The increase in longline fishing by coastal states has improved the supply of fresh yellowfin to international markets, e.g., by air freight from Indonesia, Vietnam, Malaysia, Marshall Islands, Singapore, Mexico, Fiji, to consumer markets for fresh tuna. Major primary markets are in Japan, mostly Tokyo and Osaka, and Los Angeles in the USA. Domestic urban and tourist markets have also increased demand for fresh and frozen yellowfin tuna of an intermediate value. Small fresh fish caught by artisanal fishers also find ready outlets in local wet markets. Canned and pouched yellowfin tuna are the other major trade products.

Along with other tuna, particularly skipjack tuna, yellowfin tuna is the subject of several international market access and trade preference agreements.

In the case of canned tuna, Pacific island and Indian Ocean countries rely primarily on European and USA markets, both of which are changing. The USA canned tuna market is declining, and the European market presents challenges from regulations on illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing, and food safety requirements. Consequently, the Pacific island countries, with their high dependence on exports, are looking to alternative markets in the Middle East, Latin America and emerging markets such as Eastern Europe. The form of traded product is also evolving, with increased exports of tuna in pouches as the pouches are easier to transport to factories in the Pacific than are empty cans.

In many OECD countries, canned yellowfin tuna products are the subject of seafood rating schemes, based mainly on the conservation policies of the rating group and its campaign principles, such as FAD-free, pole-and-line and handline-caught fish, stock sustainability rating, certificates achieved, e.g., MSC certified. To date, environmental conservation has been the main focus of ratings, but this is broadening. Several conservation and social campaigns and trade measures are exerting greater influences on tuna supply chains and markets: tuna satisfying fair trade principles, not caught by IUU fishing, caught by local producers using low impact fishing methods, and tuna produced under fair employment conditions, e.g., no human trafficking. In the case of fresh and frozen yellowfin tuna on the export markets, individual traded quantities are smaller than is the case for canned fish, and multiple pathways are used. For commodities such as derived products, such as saku blocks, cubes and scrape, internet market sites such as Alibaba appear to be gaining importance in linking sellers to buyers, often via agents. These sites also deal in non-branded and lesser brands of canned tuna.

EMPLOYMENT, SOCIAL FACTORS AND GENDER

The yellowfin supply chains, from pre-production services to consumption and waste removal, provide jobs for thousands of people, although many of these jobs are intermixed with those for other tuna and even non-tuna species. In 2008 in the Western and Central Pacific, nearly 10 times as many local jobs for Pacific island people were in shore-based processing (about 11,000 vs 1,100) compared to local jobs on tuna vessels. In 2010, about 5,800 crew from non-Pacific Island countries were employed on distant water fishing vessels operating in the PIC region. Additional professional jobs in tuna fisheries management and support services provide additional jobs, e.g., over 600 jobs for fisheries observers in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean. Total employment statistics for all vessels, enterprises and from all countries, however, is not available, and nor are statistics for employment on artisanal and domestic vessels and in the local supply chains. For the Indian Ocean, estimates for employment in tuna fishing, all species, are not available.

PRE-PRODUCTION SERVICES

In the large industrial fisheries, pre-production services include the logistics of food supply, bait, crew recruitment and rotation, wharf access, establishment of markets and bunkering, vessel registration, licensing, and international negotiations. The purse seine catch may be transhipped to fish carriers or reefers in port (Western and Central Pacific) and/or close to port (Indian Ocean), to convey the catch to the canneries. This facility enables the seiners to keep on fishing, and also separates the fishing roles of capture and transport, as an efficiency measure. To reduce IUU, transshipments must be monitored by observers, and as a rule, regional fisheries management organisations prohibit transhipping at sea by purse seiners, although exceptions are permitted in archipelagic and territorial waters of some member countries of WCPFC.

FISHING

Yellowfin is often caught on conjunction with fishing for other target species. In the Western and Central Pacific Ocean tuna purse seine fishery, roughly 15 to 20 percent of the catch is yellowfin, as vessels are also fishing for skipjack and opportunistically may capture yellowfin as well. Most longliners in the WCPO target albacore or higher value bigeye tuna, but also capture yellowfin tuna during fishing activities. In contrast, Indian Ocean yellowfin tuna is a target species for both purse seine and longline fleets.

Employment on vessels catching yellowfin tuna varies with the type of gear, size and country of origin of vessel, length of fishing trips, from small local boats operated by only a few fishers on day trips, to large industrial purse seiners and longliners crewed by 15-40 members. Distant water longliners may be away from shore for more than a year. Typically, flag state regulations require the skipper and other technical positions to be filled by people from the flag country of the owners, e.g., Japan, USA, Taiwan and Korea. Deck positions are filled by nationals of lower wage countries in order to lessen crewing costs. In most developing countries, however, the crew of domestic vessels are from the home country, e.g., India, Indonesia, Philippines, Vietnam and some Pacific Islands.

Economic pressures to contain fishing costs create conditions in which some fishing vessels operate without due regard to compliance with international safety and crewing standards. At the worst, cases have been documented in the Western and Central Pacific and Indian Oceans of illegal fishing vessels operated outside laws and social norms, using forced labour and abandoning crew in foreign ports. In ports, transactional sex (e.g., for money, food, fish, alcohol) happens; sexual abuse of fellow crew at sea and of children during port visits have been reported. The fisheries for yellowfin tuna are not any more affected than some other fisheries, nor immune from these problems.

Almost all at-sea workers on vessels catching yellowfin tuna are men and some boys (under 18 years). In Fiji in 2001, only 3% of people in the harvesting sector were women, compared to a majority of women in the processing sector.

In the environmental campaigns that promote tuna pole-and-line fishing and oppose purse seine and associated-FAD fishing, several social as well as environment benefits of pole-and-line have been noted. These include enhanced employment opportunities for local crews because of the increased labour requirements of pole-and-line. These same benefits result in added costs, however, and this coupled with the requirement for live bait severely limits the potential for pole-and-line fishing to adequately supply the world market. Handline fishing for large yellowfin tuna in some locations, e.g., southern Philippines and Indonesia, offers the opportunity to supply export and domestic markets as long as transportation is available to those markets.

SCIENTIFIC AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES

The Oceanic Fisheries Programme (OFP) of the Secretariat of the Pacific Community provides scientific advice to the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission. This includes catch and effort data compilation and publication of an annual yearbook, and the provision of regular stock assessments and management advice to members of the Commission.

In the Western and Central Pacific Ocean, the Pacific Island Regional Fisheries Observers arrangement (including US South Pacific Tuna Treaty observers, Forum Fisheries Agency observers, observers for the Parties to the Nauru Agreement for MSC chain of custody requirements) and national observers in some cases) coordinates fisheries observers employed by countries and regional bodies to help scientific data gathering and compliance with conservation and management measures. For the Parties to the Nauru Agreement, trained independent observers oversee the Marine Stewardship Council chain of custody system. Industrial purse seine fishing generally has 100% observer coverage (levels may be lower in Indonesia, Vietnam, Philippines) with other fishing types are covered at lower levels. Around 600 professional observers from Pacific Island countries are employed, including women observers and coordinators in some countries; observer management standards have been developed and applied.

PORTS, PROCESSING AND OTHER LAND BASED FACILITIES

The siting of tuna processing facilities in the Pacific islands of the Western and Central Pacific Ocean is closely linked to fishery access. Hence most onshore processing development has taken place in countries with significant tuna resources, e.g. Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands, and Marshall Islands.

Land-based employment faces the same cost pressures as at-sea employment. Several small island countries in the Western and Central Pacific and Indian Oceans have benefited from the creation of thousands of jobs in processing factories, ports and in indirect jobs supplying these enterprises. On the negative side, ports and factories servicing tuna industries can bring with them a range of environmental and social problems. Industrial tuna processing affects different groups of people in distinct ways, depending on whether they live near the facilities and can take advantage of or suffer the effects. Government definitions of “development” have been slow to include an assessment of working conditions, health and environmental consequences of tuna-based development, but this is beginning to change. Governments of coastal states that have secured and retained local canneries against the cost pressures, view these as a means to secure more of the benefits of their large tuna resources.

Unskilled and skilled women and men are engaged in canneries in the Pacific, Asia and Indian Ocean countries, including those canning yellowfin tuna. Unskilled labourers are on low wages, a fact that attracts processors to a particular location in the first place. Whereas men's work spans loading and unloading and the more physically-demanding tasks, women work primarily on the processing lines. Migrant women and men, often from minority ethnic groups, have been found working in some canneries in the Philippines and Thailand, where human trafficking is finally being addressed as part of the crack-down on IUU fishing. Canneries in other countries, for example PNG and Solomon Islands, overall, have been upholding international conventions pertaining to human rights that they have ratified. In addition to the direct jobs created in the canneries, as many as 2.5 times this number of indirect jobs are estimated (PNG) to also be created.

Canneries prefer to engage women processors because they are considered more skillful than men at cleaning and cutting the fish. Worldwide, tuna canneries are large-scale employers of female workers in unskilled, production-level positions, particularly skinning and loining. At least 70% of workers in PNG canneries are female; 80-90% of whom are employed in production lines. In many canneries, women are paid lower wages than are the men employees for similar work. Workers often lack job continuity and security, and the right to form collective bargaining unions. In some locations, communities are negatively affected by the women’s cannery jobs if the women live away from home and their communal obligations and child rearing fall on unemployed men and older people.

At present, canning companies are not considered likely to automate most of the processing jobs. This is partly because of the desire to retain jobs in the Western and Central Pacific and Indian Ocean countries. Consequently there has been a lack of research and development undertaken to mechanize certain processes. This is compounded by the perceived difficulties in installing and maintaining high technology automation in relatively remote locations where many tuna processing factories are located.

GUIDE TO FURTHER READING

Note: Details of all sources are given in References below.

For tuna fishing and processing technology, see Mike McCoy and colleagues (2015) (Western and Central Pacific Ocean), Liam Campling and Martin Doherty (2007), and Amanda Hamilton and colleagues (2011b); for Pakistan see Muhammad Moazzam and Rab Nawaz (2014). For a guide to on-board processing of tuna for the sashimi market, see Michel Blanc and colleagues (2005).

For the types of products and markets Makoto Peter Miyake and colleagues (2010), and for value-added and byproducts, see INFOFISH (2007), and Shri Sreekanth G.B. and colleagues (2010).

For common names, see FishBase (www.fishbase.org), and Makato Peter Miyake and colleagues (2010) for USA names. For nutritional information, see NOAA FishWatch Pacific Yellowfin Tuna Table of Nutrition; Peter Nichols and colleagues (1998), and Australian Fishfiles (http://www.fishfiles.com.au/knowing/species/finfish/tuna-billfish/Pages/Yellowfin-Tuna.aspx).

For information on mercury in yellowfin tuna, see Maureen Kumar and colleagues (2004) (Fiji), Gary Myers and colleagues (2007) (Seychelles), and the Codex Alimentarius Commission, (2014). For information on mercury and selenium, see John Kaneko and Nicholas Ralston (2007) and Joanna Burger and Michael Gochfeld (2011).

For trade and markets, see Makato Peter Miyake and colleagues (2010), Mike McCoy and colleagues (2015), and Liam Campling 2015.

For employment in tuna supply chains, see Amanda Hamilton and colleagues (2011b) (global), and Robert Gillett (2009) (Pacific Island countries), Robert Gillett (2011) (pole-and-line fishing). For labour problems on vessels, see Eve de Coning (2011); and for legal instruments relevant to seafarers on fishing vessels, see the International Collective in Support of Fish Workers site (http://legal.icsf.net/icsflegal/). For women fishers, see Patricia Tuara Demmke (2006). For information on the Pacific Island Fisheries Regional Observers, see http://www.spc.int/oceanfish/en/ofpsection/fisheries-monitoring/observers.

For processing factories labour and other local issues, see Kate Barclay and Ian Cartwright (2008), Elizabeth Havice and Kristen Reed (2012), Parris (2010), and Olha Krushelnytska (2015). For gender information, see Patricia Tuara Demmke (2006), Amanda Hamilton and colleagues (2011a), Nancy Sullivan and Vina Ram-Bidesi (2007), Eve de Coning (2011). For the outlook for factory automation, see Mike McCoy and colleagues (2015).

REFERENCES

• Barclay, K & I Cartwright. 2008. Capturing Wealth from Tuna: Case Studies from the Pacific. Asia Pacific Press, ANU Canberra.
• Blanc, M, A Desurmont & S Beverly. 2005. Onboard handling of sashimi-grade tuna a practical guide for crew members. Secretariat for the Pacific Community, Noumea, 25 p.
• Burger, J & M Gochfeld. 2011 Mercury and selenium levels in 19 species of saltwater fish from New Jersey as a function of species, size, and season. Science of the Total Environment, 409:1418-1429.
• Campling, L. & Doherty, M. 2007. A comparative analysis of cost structure and SPS issues in canned tuna production in Mauritius/ Seychelles and Thailand: Is there a level playing field? Final report submitted to The Project Management Unit, Regional Trade Facilitation Programme. 18 July 2007.
• Campling, L. 2015. Assessing alternative markets: Pacific Islands canned tuna & tuna loins. Pacific Islands Forum Fisheries Agency, Honiara, Solomon Islands, 72p.
• Codex Alimentarius Commission. 2014. Report of the Eight Session of the Codex Committee on Contaminants in Foods. 31 March-4 April 2014. The Hague, The Netherlands. (REP14/CF).
• de Coning, E. 2011. Transnational organized crime in the Fishing Industry. Focus on: Trafficking in Persons, Smuggling of Migrants, Illicit Drugs Trafficking. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, 2011. United Nations, Vienna. 144 p.
• Gillett, R. 2009. Fisheries in the Economies of the Pacific Island Countries and Territories. Asian Development Bank, Manila, Philippines, 483 p.
• Gillett, R. 2011. The promotion of pole-and-line tuna fishing n the Pacific Islands: emerging issues and lessons learned. Report prepared for the Forum Fisheries Agency by Gillett, Preston and Associates, Inc. 46 p.
• Hamilton, A, A Lewis, & L Campling. 2011a. Report on the implementation of the derogation to the standard rules of origin granted to the Pacific ACP States in the framework of the Interim Economic Partnership Agreement. Report to the European Union; FWC COM 2011 RFS 2011/266449. 207 p.
• Hamilton, A, A Lewis, MA McCoy, E Havice, & L Campling. 2011b. Market and industry dynamics in the global tuna supply chain. Forum Fisheries Agency, Honiara. 393 p.
• Havice, E & K Reed. 2012. Fishing for development? Tuna resource access and industrial change in Papua New Guinea. Journal of Agrarian Change, 12(3-4): 413-435.
• INFOFISH. 2007. The Manual on Processing, Pagkaging and Presentation of Value-added Tuna products. INFOFISH, Kuala Lumpur.
• Kaneko, JJ & NVC Ralston. 2007. Selenium and mercury in pelagic fish in the central north Pacific near Hawaii. Biological Trace Element Research, 119:242-254.
• Kumar, M, B Aalbersberg & L Mosley. 2004. Mercury levels in Fijian seafoods and potential health implications. Report for World Health Organization (WHO), University of the South Pacific, Suva, Fiji, 35p.
• Krushelnytska, O. 2015. Toward Gender-Equitable Fisheries Management in Solomon Islands. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2015/07/24833378/toward-gender-equitable-fisheries-management-solomon-islands (accessed 5 August 2015).
• McCoy, MA, DG Itano and SJ Pollard. 2015. A forward-looking study of development opportunities in FFA member countries in the tuna industry. Gillett, Preston and Associates Inc., Australian Aid and Devfish II, 100p.
• Moazzam, M & R Nawaz. 2014. By-catch of tuna gillnet fisheries of Pakistan: A serious threat to non-target, endangered and threatened species. Journal Marine Biological Association of India, 56:85-90.
• Miyake, MP, P Guillotreau, CH Sun, & G Ishimura. 2010. Recent developments in the tuna industry: stocks, fisheries, management, processing, trade and markets. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper No.543. Rome, FAO. 125 p.
• Myers, GJ, PW Davidson, & JJ Strain. 2007. Nutrient and methyl mercury exposure from consuming fish. Journal of Nutrition, 137: 2805-2808.
• Nichols, PD, P Virtue, BD Mooney, NG Elliot, & GK Yearsley. 1998. Seafood the Good Food. The oil content and composition of Australian commercial fishes, shellfishes and crustaceans. FRDC Project 95/122. Guide prepared for the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation.
• Parriss, H. 2010. Tuna dreams and tuna realities: Defining the term "maximising economic returns from the tuna fisheries" in six Pacific Island states. Marine Policy, 34: 105-113.
• Sreekanth, GB, SK Chakraborty, S Basu, AK Jaiswar, & PG Ambarish. 2010. Yellowfin and bigeye tuna of Indian EEZ: Sashimi grade processing and product development: future scope. Fishing Chimes, 30(4):9- 18.
• Sullivan, N. & V Ram-Bidesi. 2007. Devfish Project study on gender issues in tuna fisheries. Case studies in Papua New Guinea, Fiji and Kiribati. Final Report. Fishtech Management Consultants. 94 p.
• Tuara Demmke, P. 2006. Gender issues in the Pacific Islands tuna industry. A report for the Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat. 51 p.

All fishing gears have some level of environmental effect. Under the FAO Code of Conduct for Responsible Fishing, the fishing sector is expected to reduce its effects to the minimum possible in ways that are also compatible with its own sustained existence. For yellowfin tuna caught in surface and deep waters by a wide variety of fishing methods, bycatch is one of the most observable effects of fishing on the environment. This is especially the case when yellowfin tuna are caught by longline, gillnet and by purse seining on floating objects, including fish aggregating devices (FADs). Air and water pollution from fishing vessels and fish processing are other environmental concerns.

Environmental variation also has an effect on the abundance and distribution of yellowfin tuna. As the ocean warms and becomes more acidic due to increased emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), the distribution and catchability of yellowfin tuna stocks are expected to become even more variable.

EFFECTS OF YELLOWFIN FISHING ON OTHER SPECIES

Yellowfin tuna are caught by purse-seine nets, longline, pole-and-line and troll line in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean (WCPO), and by gill nets, longline, purse seine, pole-and-line, handline and troll line in the Indian Ocean (IO) (see Production). These gears do not come into contact with the seafloor and so do not directly affect the benthic environment.

Nevertheless, longline fishing for yellowfin, albacore and bigeye tuna has a substantial bycatch of non-tuna species. Varying by area of the WCPO, the main fish bycatch species include sharks (especially blue shark which may be a target species), billfish, pelagic stingrays, and moonfish or opah (Lampris guttatus).

Sharks are not always caught as bycatch. Sometimes, they are targeted for their fins and meat because longline crews often take the opportunity to top up their incomes through sales of shark fins. Tens of thousands of sharks are caught (and usually finned) each year in the WCPO and IO. As a result, catches of many shark species have experienced steep declines in recent years, most likely due to high fishing mortality.

In the WCPO about a dozen species of shark have been identified as common bycatch: blue shark (Prionace glauca), silky shark (Carcharhinus falciformis), oceanic whitetip shark (Carcharhinus longimanus), mako sharks (Isurus spp), thresher sharks (Alopias spp), porbeagle shark (Lamna nasus), winghead hammerhead (Eusphyra blochii), scalloped hammerhead (Sphyrna corona), great hammerhead (Sphyrna mokarran) and smooth hammerhead (Sphyrna zygaena). In the IO, shark catches have been recorded only recently and refer mainly to retained catch.

Conversely, sharks cause considerable damage to tuna on hooks in the longline fishery, and reduce the value of the tuna catch.

Changing the types of hooks used on longlines and their positions in the water column, replacing wire traces with nylon leaders, and improved shark handling practices, are being used or investigated to 1) reduce the catch of sharks, 2) improve condition of sharks on landing and survival upon release, and 3) enhance the catch of target species.

Longline catches of seabirds, marine mammals and turtles are significant in some areas.

Gill nets, which are used extensively in the IO, are of greatest concern for bycatch among the surface fisheries for yellowfin tuna. Gillnet fishing is poorly monitored. The proportion of non-tuna species in the purse-seine catch is relatively low, whether the nets are set around FADs (1.6%) or on free-swimming schools not associated with FADs (0.4%). In the WCPO surface fisheries, the bycatch of non-tuna species includes mainly silky shark, mackerel scad, mahi mahi, frigate mackerel, oceanic triggerfish and rainbow runner. The bycatch of juvenile bigeye tuna is of concern in the tropical purse-seine fishery. The bycatch from pole-and-line and troll fisheries is minimal. However, when pole-and-line fishing was much more common than it is today, localized depletion of stocks of the small pelagic fish species used as live bait was of concern to some Pacific countries.

The Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC) and the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC) have conservation measures for bycatch mitigation and monitoring. Specific conservation and management measures address bycatch issues for sea turtles, sharks (including finning), sea birds, cetaceans, other finfish and reporting provisions to support bycatch research and monitoring. The International Seafood Sustainability Foundation (ISSF) conducts regionally specific bycatch mitigation training workshops for purse-seine vessel skippers and publishes guidebooks for purse-seine skippers and observers, and for longline skippers (http://www.issfguidebooks.org/downloadable-guides/)

IMPACTS ON AIR AND WATER

Purse-seine and longline vessels rely on fossil fuel and thus their exhaust fumes and refrigerant gases contribute to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and global warming. The estimated total carbon footprint of tuna caught by purse seine (all species) was approximately 1,530 kg CO2 per tonne of tuna landed (2009 estimate). The GHG emissions associated with catching tuna by purse-seine vessels, storing the fish on board, and delivering whole fish to processing plants are three times greater than the emissions stemming from the processing, packaging and transport of the resulting products. The amount of fuel used to catch a tonne of tuna is greater for longline vessels than for purse-seine vessels. The carbon footprint of longline tuna products is increased further if air freight is used to deliver sashimi-grade tuna and other fresh tuna products to markets because GHG emissions are much higher for airfreight than for sea freight.

The most significant environmental effects from catching juvenile yellowfin tuna in surface fisheries are point-source impacts from canning. Many of the countries that process and export canned tuna are developing countries: Thailand, Seychelles, Mauritius, Kenya, Indonesia (IO) and Philippines, Indonesia, Papua New Guinea, Fiji, American Samoa (WCPO). In these low-cost countries, the processing (‘canning’ or ‘loining’) facilities undertake the labour-intensive activities while the actual canning may also be done there or in higher-cost countries such as Spain and Germany. The amount of factory waste has increased significantly in low-cost countries, which generally have less capacity to regulate environmental impacts. As a result, in the vicinity of the factories, local access to coastal food resources, and quality of life, may be affected.

Another environmental effect of fish processing is the high consumption of water for transporting fish and offal around the plant in flume systems, for cleaning plant and equipment, for washing raw materials and product, and for de-icing and thawing.

EFFECTS OF ENVIRONMENT ON YELLOWFIN

Ocean conditions have pronounced effects on the distribution and abundance of tropical tuna. While these effects are best documented for skipjack tuna, they also occur for yellowfin tuna.

In the WCPO, the most conspicuous of these effects are due to the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) in the WCPO. ENSO is a swing between warmer (El Niño) and cooler (La Niña) ocean conditions across much of the tropical Pacific, that also affects the depth of the thermocline and the extent of the upper mixed layer. It occurs on irregular cycles (2-7 years) due to interactions between the atmosphere and the ocean. Changes in ocean currents and temperatures linked to ENSO are likely to influence where and when yellowfin tuna spawn, and how larvae, juveniles and their prey are dispersed or retained in areas conducive to their growth and survival. El Niño events appear to be favourable to yellowfin tuna recruitment because the main yellowfin tuna spawning grounds in the WCPO are associated with the warm pool, which expands during such events.

Annually, the IO has two distinct monsoon seasons that cause seasonal changes to oceanic and coastal waters, including in the depth of the thermocline and position of convergence zones. In turn, these changes affect the distribution of yellowfin tuna and its vulnerability to fishing gears. Yellowfin tuna is caught in greater numbers where the thermocline is shallow. In addition, year to year variation in the seasonal pattern of changes is large and associated with the Indian Ocean Dipole, a climate oscillation (on irregular cycles of 4-5 years) between a warmer (positive) and a cooler (negative) state. Indices measuring the state of the Indian Ocean Dipole are better predictors of warm and cold events in the Western Indian Ocean than are ENSO events, although ENSO events also appear to have an influence, especially if intense.

A complex relationship exists between the Indian Ocean Dipole and the yellowfin-tuna catches of purse-seines and longlines, including differences across sub-regions of the IO. In the western IO, the distribution and longline catches of yellowfin tuna are influenced by the Indian Ocean Dipole. With a period of about 4 years. High sea surface temperatures (>29.5 °C) tend to be related to low primary production and decreased catch rates during positive Indian Ocean Dipole events. Especially in the Arabian Sea and around Madagascar, increased yellowfin tuna catch rates occur in association with negative Indian Ocean Dipole events, along with lower sea surface temperature and high primary production.

EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON YELLOWFIN

Increased GHG emissions are expected to increase sea surface temperatures (SST), stratification of the water column and the pH of seawater, and alter the strength of major currents and counter currents. In the WCPO, SST and the average extent of the warm pool are expected to progressively resemble present-day El Niño conditions. Modelling of the projected effects of changes to the WCPO on yellowfin tuna has yet to be completed. However, such effects are expected to be somewhat similar to the projections that have been made for skipjack tuna. In the shorter term (by 2035), increases in catches may occur in the central and eastern areas of the region. However, by the end of the century, decreased catches are expected in the EEZs of all Pacific Island countries and territories except French Polynesia and Cook Islands.

In the WCPO, the prime yellowfin tuna fishing grounds are expected to move progressively eastward along the equator, and towards higher latitudes. Where yellowfin tuna remains within its preferred temperature range, catch rates of surface schools may increase as the water column becomes more stratified due to increasing SST and decreasing salinity resulting from the projected increases in in rainfall in equatorial regions.

GUIDE TO FURTHER READING

Note: Details of all sources are given in References below.

For preliminary estimates of the impact of tuna fishing on non-tuna species, see Ana Justel-Rubio & Victor Restrepo (2015). For bycatch of longlines, see Victor Restrepo and colleagues (2014. For bycatch on longlines in the WCPO, see Shelton Harley and colleagues (2010).

For sharks and longline fishing, see Mike McCoy & Robert Gillett (2005), Shelley Clarke, (2011), Shelley Clarke and colleagues (2011) and (2014) and Tim Lawson (2011) for the WCPO, David Ardill and colleagues (2011) for the IO. Makoto Peter Miyake and others (2010) reported on shark damage to tuna on longlines. The WCPFC’s Conservation and Management Measure (CMM) 2010-07 lists shark species of concern. For information on fishing gear modifications to reduce longline shark catch and bycatch see Don Bromhead and others (2013), Pew Marine Environment Group (2011), and Peter Ward and others (2007).

For longline catches of seabirds, mammals and sea turtles, see Shelley Clarke and colleagues (2014). For remarks on surface fisheries for yellowfin tuna catches and gill nets, see ISSF (2014a). For purse-seine catch information for the WCPO, see Shelton Harley and colleagues (2010). On baitfish for pole and line fishing in Solomon Islands and Fiji, see Steve Blaber and others (1993); for Maldives see R. Charles Anderson (1997). For bycatch conservation and monitoring measures of the WCPFC, see https://www.wcpfc.int/conservation-and-management-measures, for IOTC see http://www.iotc.org/cmms; for a recent compendium of measures, see ISSF (2014b). For ISSF skippers' and observers' guides, see http://www.issfguidebooks.org/downloadable-guides/.

Peter Tyedmers and Robert Parker (2011) provide a preliminary assessment of the impacts of bigeye tuna fishing and supply chain on air and water. The report from UNEP (2000) provided information on the environment impacts of tuna processing.

For information on tuna fish processing, see Makoto Peter Miyake and others (2010), Amanda Hamilton and others (2011), Elizabeth Havice & Kristen Reed (2012), Patricia Tuara (2006), Nancy Sullivan & Vina Ram-Bidesi (2007), Kate Barclay & Ian Cartwright (2007), and UNEP (2000).

For the effects of the environment and oceanography (including the ENSO in the WCPO) on yellowfin tuna distribution and biology, see Patrick Lehodey and others (2003), (1997) and (2011), Janice Lough and others (2011), Alexandre Ganachaud and others (2011) for the WCPO; and, for the IO, Francis Marsac (2001, 2014), Frederic Ménard and others (2007), Kathleen Miller (2007), and Ana Corbineau and others (2008), and Kuo-Wei Lan and colleagues (2013).

For the effects of climate change on yellowfin tuna stocks and the supporting ecosystem in the WCPO see Alexandre Ganachaud and others (2011), Patrick Lehodey and others (2011), (2013), Johann Bell and others (2013), Janice Lough and others (2011), and Robert Le Borgne and others (2011).

REFERENCES

• Anderson, RC. 1997. The Maldivian tuna livebait fishery -status and trends. Pp 69-92, in DJ Nickerson and MH Maniku (eds), Proceedings of the Workshop on Integrated Reef Resources Management in the Maldives, Male (Maldives) 16-20 Mar 1996. FAO, Madras (India). Bay of Bengal Programme. http://www.fao.org/docrep/X5623E/x5623e0k.htm#paper 1: the maldivian tuna livebait fishery status and trends by r. charles.
• Ardill, D, D Itano & R Gillett. 2011. A Review of Bycatch and Discard Issues in Indian Ocean Tuna Fisheries. IOTC-2012-WPEB08-INF20. 44 p.
• Barclay, K & I Cartwright. 2007. Governance of tuna industries: The key to economic viability and sustainability in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean. Marine Policy 31: 348–358.
• Bell, JD, A Ganachaud, PC Gehrke, SP Griffiths, AJ Hobday, O Hoegh-Guldberg, JE Johnson, R Le Borgne, P Lehodey, JM Lough, RJ Matear, TD Pickering, MS Pratchett, A Sen Gupta, I Senina & M Waycott. 2013. Mixed responses of tropical Pacific fisheries and aquaculture to climate change. Nature Climate Change, 3:591-599.
• Blaber, SMJ, DA Milton & NJF Rawlinson. 1993. Tuna Baitfish in Fiji and Solomon Islands, proceedings of a workshop, Suva, Fiji, 17-18 Aug. 1993. Canberra: Australian Council for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) Proceedings 52.
• Bromhead, D, J Rice & S Harley. 2013. Analyses of the potential influence of four gear factors (leader type, hook type, “shark” lines and bait type) on shark catch rates in WCPO tuna longline fisheries. WCPFC-SC9-2013/EB-WP-02 rev 1.
• Clarke SC. 2011. A status snapshot of key shark species in the Western and Central Pacific and potential mitigation options. Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission Scientific Committee Seventh Regular Session, 9-17 August 2011, Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia. WCPFC-SC7-2011/EB-WP-04. 37 p.
• Clarke S, S Harley, S Hoyle & J Rice. 2011. An indicator-based analysis of key shark species based on data held by SPC-OFP. Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission Scientific Committee Seventh Regular Session, 9-17 August 2011, Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia. WCPFC-SC7-2011/EB-WP-01 89 p.
• Clarke, S, M Sato, C Small, B Sullivan, Y Inoue, & D Ochi. 2014. Bycatch in longline fisheries for tuna and tuna-like species: a global review of status and mitigation measures. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper No. 588. Rome, FAO. 199 p.
• Corbineau, A, T Rouyer, B Cazelles, JM Fromentin, A Fonteneau, & F Ménard. 2008. Time series analysis of tuna and swordfish catches and climate variability in the Indian Ocean (1968-2003). Aquatic Living Resources, 21:277-285.
• Ganachaud, AS, A Sen Gupta, JC Orr, SE Wijffels, KR Ridgway, MA Hemer, C Maes, CR Steinberg, AD Tribollet, B Qiu & JC Kruger. 2011. Observed and expected changes to the tropical Pacific Ocean. In Bell JD, JE Johnson and AJ Hobday (eds). Vulnerability of Tropical Pacific Fisheries and Aquaculture to Climate Change. Secretariat of the Pacific Community, Noumea, New Caledonia. pp 101-188.
• Hamilton, A, A Lewis, & L Campling. 2011. Report on the Implementation of the derogation to the standard rules of origin granted to the Pacific ACP States in the framework of the Interim Economic Partnership Agreement. Report to the European Union; FWC COM 2011 RFS 2011/266449. 207 p.
• Harley, S, P Williams, S Nicol, & J Hampton. 2010. The Western and Central Pacific Tuna Fishery: 2007-2008 Overview and Status of Stocks. Secretariat of the Pacific Community Oceanic Fisheries Programme Tuna Fisheries Assessment Report 9, Noumea, New Caledonia.
• Havice, E & K Reed. 2012. Fishing for development? Tuna resource access and industrial change in Papua New Guinea. Journal of Agrarian Change, 12:413-435.
• ISSF (International Seafood Sustainability Foundation). 2014a. Tuna Stock Status Update: Status of the world fisheries for tuna. ISSF Technical Report 2014-09. International Seafood Sustainability Foundation, Washington, D.C., USA.
• ISSF (International Seafood Sustainability Foundation). 2014b. ISSF Tuna Stock Status Update, 2014: Status of the world fisheries for tuna. ISSF Technical Report 2014-09. International Seafood Sustainability Foundation, Washington, D.C., USA.
• Justel-Rubio, A & V Restrepo. 2015. Preliminary study of the relative fishery impacts on non-tuna species caught in tuna fisheries. ISSF Technical Report 2015-02. International Seafood Sustainability Foundation, Washington, D.C., USA.
• Lan, KW, K Evans & MA Lee. 2013. Effects of climate variability on the distribution and fishing conditions of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) in the western Indian Ocean. Climatic Change 119:63-77.
• Lawson, T. 2011. Estimation of Catch Rates and Catches of Key Shark Species in Tuna Fisheries of the Western and Central Pacific Ocean Using Observer Data. Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission Scientific Committee Seventh Regular Session, 9-17 August 2011, Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia. WCPFC-SC7-2011 / EB-IP-02. 52 p.
• Le Borgne, R, V Allain, SP Griffiths, RJ Matear, AD McKinnon, AJ Richardson & JW Young. 2011. Vulnerability of open ocean food webs in the tropical Pacific to climate change. pp 189-250, in JD Bell, JE Johnson & AJ Hobday (eds), Vulnerability of Tropical Pacific Fisheries and Aquaculture to Climate Change. Secretariat of the Pacific Community, Noumea, New Caledonia.
• Lehodey, P., M Bertignac, J Hampton, A Lewis, & J Picaut. 1997. El Niño Southern Oscillation and tuna in the western Pacific. Nature, 389(6652):715-718.
• Lehodey, P, F Chai & J Hampton. 2003. Modelling climate-related variability of tuna populations from a coupled ocean-biogeochemical-populations dynamics model. Fisheries and Oceanography, 12:483-494.
• Lehodey P, J Hampton, RW Brill, S Nicol, I Senina, B Calmettes, HO Pörtner, L Bopp L, T Ilyina, JD Bell & J Sibert J. 2011. Vulnerability of oceanic fisheries in the tropical Pacific to climate change. pp 433-492, in JD Bell, JE Johnson & AJ Hobday (eds), Vulnerability of Tropical Pacific Fisheries and Aquaculture to Climate Change. Secretariat of the Pacific Community, Noumea, New Caledonia.
• Lehodey, P, I Senina, B Calmettes, J Hampton & S Nicol. 2013. Modelling the effect of climate change on Pacific skipjack population and fisheries. Climatic Change 119: 95-109.
• Lough JM, GA Meehl & MJ Salinger. 2011. Observed and projected changes in surface climate of the tropical Pacific. Pp 49-100, in: JD Bell, JE Johnson and AJ Hobday (eds) Vulnerability of Tropical Pacific Fisheries and Aquaculture to Climate Change. Secretariat of the Pacific. Community, Noumea, New Caledonia.
• Marsac F. 2001. Climate and oceanographic indices appraising the environmental fluctuations in the Indian Ocean. IOTC Proc 4:293-301.
• Marsac, F. 2014. Outline of climate and oceanographic conditions in the Indian Ocean: an update to August 2014. IOTC-2014-WPTT16-24, 15p.
• McCoy MA & RD Gillett. 2005. Tuna longlining by China in the Pacific Islands: a description and considerations for increasing benefits to FFA member countries. FFA Report 05/13. Gillett, Preston & Associates Inc. 80 p.
• Ménard, F, F Marsac, E Bellier & B Cazelles. 2007. Climatic oscillations and tuna catch rates in the Indian Ocean: a wavelet approach to time series analysis. Fisheries Oceanography 16:95-104.
• Miller, KA. 2007. Climate variability and tropical tuna: management challenges for highly migratory fish stocks. Marine Policy, 31:56-70.
• Miyake MP, P Guillotreau, CH Sun & G Ishimura. 2010. Recent developments in the tuna industry: stocks, fisheries, management, processing, trade and markets. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper. No. 543. Rome, FAO. 125 pp.
• Pew Environment Group. 2011. Recommendations to Kobe III joint tuna RFMO meeting. http://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/fact-sheets/2010/06/16/shark-bycatch-in-tuna-fisheries (accessed -5 February 2015).
• Restrepo, V, L Dagorn, D Itano, A Justel‐Rubio, F Forget & JD Filmalter. 2014. A Summary of bycatch issues and ISSF mitigation initiatives to-date in purse seine fisheries, with emphasis on FADs. ISSF Technical Report 2014-11. International Seafood Sustainability Foundation, Washington, D.C., USA, 25p.
• Sullivan, N & V Ram-Bidesi. 2007. Devfish Project study on gender issues in tuna fisheries. Case studies in Papua New Guinea, Fiji and Kiribati. Final Report. Fishtech Management Consultants. 94 pp.
• Tuara Demmke, P. 2006. Gender issues in the Pacific Islands tuna industry. A report for the Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat. 51 p.
• Tyedmers, P, & R Parker. 2012. Fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions from global tuna fisheries: preliminary assessment. ISSF Technical Report 2012-03. International Seafood Sustainability Foundation, McLean, Virginia, USA.
• UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme). 2000. Cleaner Production Assessment in Fish Processing. United Nations Environment Programme. www.unep.fr/shared/publications/pdf/2481-CPfish.pdf (accessed 7 February 2015).
• Ward P, E Lawrence, R Darbyshire & S Hindmarsh. 2007. Large-scale experiment shows that nylon leaders reduce shark bycatch and benefit pelagic longline fishers. Fisheries Research, 90: 100-108.
• WCPFC (Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission). 2010. Conservation and Management Measure (CMM) 2010-07.

DESCRIPTION

The yellowfin tuna is a large, elongate fish with a round and tapered body. Its body is deepest at the first dorsal fin. Some large specimens have very long second dorsal and anal fins, which can be more than 20% of fork length (FL). The pectoral fins are moderately long, usually reaching beyond the origin of the second dorsal fin but not beyond the end of its base. The back is metallic dark blue in colour, changing to yellow and then to silver on belly, which is frequently crossed, at juvenile sizes by about 20 broken, nearly vertical lines. These lines disappear in adults. The second dorsal and anal fins, and dorsal and anal finlets, are bright yellow. The finlets may have a narrow black border. There is a strong lateral keel on the caudal peduncle. Yellowfin tuna has 26-34 gill rakers on the first gill arch.

Yellowfin tuna has a swim bladder. When inflated, the swimbladder is about half the length of the body cavity whereas, in bigeye tuna, the swimbladder reaches most of the length of the body cavity.

Yellowfin tuna is similar in appearance to bigeye tuna, but can be distinguished using several external features (body markings, body shape, head and eye shape, pectoral and caudal fin characteristics, finlet coloration) and internal features (liver shape, swimbladder size). Juveniles of yellowfin and bigeye tuna are more difficult to distinguish than are adults.

ECOSYSTEM ROLE

Together with the other species of tropical tuna, yellowfin tuna is near the top of the pelagic food chain. Tunas typically follow the daily vertical movement of their preferred prey (micronekton), moving to deeper habitats during the day and to shallower habitats at night. Yellowfin tuna spends most of its foraging time above the thermocline. As it grows, yellowfin tuna is able to capture larger prey, within the limits of the sizes available. As an oceanic predator spending considerable time in the surface layers, especially when young, yellowfin tuna also consumes prey (eggs, invertebrate and fish plankton) exported from reef ecosystems.

Predators of yellowfin tuna include other tunas, including other yellowfin tuna, pelagic sharks, sailfish, marlins, and toothed whales including dolphins.

HABITAT AND DISTRIBUTION

Yellowfin tuna mainly inhabit tropical and subtropical waters of the Atlantic, Indian and Pacific oceans, but can occur up to 40^oN and 40^oS. It is found predominately in tropical coastal and open ocean ecoregions, in waters from the surface to the mixed layer depth that varies with place and season. Yellowfin tuna does not occur over shallow coastal shelves (ocean depths less than about 50 m). [See slide show for yellowfin tuna distribution map]. In the Pacific, most of the population occurs from 20^oN to 20^oS.

Yellowfin tuna tolerates a wide range of environmental conditions. Water temperature and oxygen levels have a major influence on the habitats yellowfin tuna occupies. Like other tuna, the blood circulation of yellowfin has a heat exchanger system that can sustain muscle temperature significantly above that of the water. This specialized anatomy gives yellowfin tuna enhanced swimming efficiency and the ability to live within a relatively wide range of temperatures. Yellowfin tuna regulates its body temperature in response to muscle temperature changes, moving into cooler or warmer waters as required. As a result, yellowfin can feed in both sunlit surface waters and in deeper, cooler nutrient-rich layers of the ocean.

Yellowfin tuna have been found in water temperatures of 18^o to 31^oC, but most commonly live between 20^o to 30^oC. Yellowfin tuna spend less than 10% of their time at depths where oxygen (O₂) levels are < 4.3 mg/l (3.3 mg/l, 65% saturation). As a result of temperature preferences and tolerances, juvenile and adult yellowfin usually remain in depths in which temperatures are within 8^oC of that of the surface water although occasionally they dive to around 1000 m. In the Indian Ocean, the main swimming depth for adult yellowfin tuna caught by longline is from 80 m to 200 m.

Yellowfin tuna can be highly migratory, and long-distance movements of thousands of nautical miles have been recorded. However, the vast majority of recorded movements of tagged yellowfin tuna have been much shorter. For example, the median lifetime displacement for yellowfin tuna in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean (WCPO) is 337-380 nm.

Although tagging data indicate that yellowfin tuna in the WCPO are a single stock, sub-regional biological differences are possible and need further investigation. In the IO, tagging data support the assumption that yellowfin tuna comprises a single stock.

GROWTH, REPRODUCTION AND DIET

Yellowfin tuna growth is complex, and goes through several stages over its life. A juvenile yellowfin tuna grows quickly to about 40 cm FL and is first caught in surface commercial fisheries when only several months old. Growth slows between 40 and 70 cm and then accelerates again between 70 and 100 cm FL, probably during sexual maturation. Older fish live in deeper colder waters. Growth rate plateaus and declines with size. Young yellowfin tuna may grow more slowly in the equatorial waters of Indonesia and the Philippines than in the wider area of the Western and Central Pacific Ocean. The estimated average maximum size is 180 cm and 100 kg. Tag-and-release information, indicates that yellowfin live for at least six years.

Yellowfin tuna reaches sexual maturity at a length of 95-120 cm FL and an age of 2 to 3.5 years. However, in exceptional circumstances, it can become mature at 50- 60 cm FL and an age of 12 -15 months. Spawning can take place all year-round, but is most frequent during the summer months in each hemisphere. Yellowfin tuna are multiple batch (serial) spawners, i.e. they spawn eggs and sperm into the water column almost every day over the spawning period. Average batch fecundity (egg production per spawning event) is 2.2 million in the Western Pacific.

Extensive sampling of tuna stomachs has shown that the diet of yellowfin tuna is diverse, comprising a variety of surface-dwelling and deeper-dwelling fish species, pelagic crustaceans and squid. The diet also changes with age. In the Western and Central Pacific Ocean, juvenile yellowfin tuna (< 45 cm) consume mainly anchovies (Engraulidae), other small surface-dwelling fish (including reef-associated fish during their pelagic phase) and planktonic crustaceans. Subadult (45-120 cm) and adult (>120 cm) yellowfin prey on scombrid fishes (including juvenile skipjack tuna), pelagic-stages of reef fish, squid and deeper-dwelling fish.

_____________________________________________________________________

Guide to Further Reading

Note: Details of all sources are given below in References.

For description of yellowfin tuna, see Bruce Collette (2001). For the most comprehensive guides and handbooks to the identification of yellowfin and bigeye tuna, from fresh to frozen and damaged, see the Secretariat for the Pacific Community FAME Digital Library, and enter "yellowfin" AND "David Itano" (author) into the search boxes to obtain the guides, many in several languages; also see David Itano (2005). See also for Kurt Schaefer (1999) on physical differences, including extent of swim bladder.

For ecosystem role, with an emphasis on the Western and Central Pacific Ocean (WCPO), see John Sibert and colleagues (2006) and Valerie Allain and colleagues (2012); and, on predators, FishBase.

For habitat and distribution, see Gabriel Reygondeau and colleagues (2012) for ecoregions, Makoto Peter Miyake and colleagues (2010), and FAO yellowfin tuna distribution map (link). For stock structure, see WCPFC (2012) and, for IO, Adam Langley and colleagues (2009).

For environmental and habitat information, see Paul Sund and colleagues (1981), and Patrick Lehodey and colleagues (2011). For temperature, oxygen, and depth distribution information, see Richard Brill and colleagues (1999), Li Ming Song and colleagues (2008), and Kurt Schaefer and colleagues (2011). For WCPO yellowfin tuna displacements, see John Sibert and John Hampton (2003).

For growth, see Alain Fonteneau and Didier Gascuel (2008), Alain Fonteneau and Emmanuel Chassot (2013), Adam Langley and colleagues (2011), Patrick Lehodey and Bruno Leroy (1999).

For reproduction, see Kurt Schaefer (1996, 1998), Patrick Lehodey and Bruno Leroy (1999), David Itano (2000) For diet, in WCPO see Arnaud Bertrand and colleagues (2002), Valerie Allain and colleagues (2012); in Indian Ocean see Michel Potier and colleagues (2004); and, more generally, FishBase.

References

• Allain, V, E Fernandez, SD Hoyle, S Caillot, J Jurado-Molina, S Andréfouët, & SJ Nicol. 2012. Interaction between coastal and oceanic ecosystems of the western and central Pacific Ocean through predator-prey relationship studies. PLoS ONE. 7 (5)
• Bertrand, A, F-X Bard & E Josse. 2002. Tuna food habits related to the micronekton distribution in French Polynesia. Marine Biology 140:1023-1037.
• Brill, RW, BA Block, CH Boggs, KA Bigelow, EV Freund & DJ Marcinek. 1999. Horizontal movements and depth distribution of large adult yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) near the Hawaiian Islands, recorded using ultrasonic telemetry: implications for the physiological ecology of pelagic fishes. Marine Biology 133:395-408.
• Collette, BB. 2001. Tunas (also, albacore, bonitos, mackerels, seerfishes, and wahoo). Pp 3721-3756, in K.E. Carpenter & V.H. Niem (eds), FAO species identification guide for fishery purposes. The living marine resources of the Western Central Pacific. Vol. 6: bony fishes part 4 (Labridae to Latimeriidae), estuarine crocodiles, sea turtles, sea snakes and marine mammals. Rome, FAO.
• Fonteneau, A. and D. Gascuel. 2008. Growth rates and apparent growth curves, for yellowfin, skipjack and bigeye tagged and recovered in the Indian Ocean during the IOTTP. IOTC-2008-WPTDA-08.
• Fonteneau, A. and E. Chassot. 2013. An Overview of Yellowfin Tuna Growth in the Atlantic Ocean: Von Bertalanffy or Multistanza Growth? ICCAT, SCRS/2012/045 Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT, 69(5):2059-2075.
• Itano, DG. 2000. The reproductive biology of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) in Hawaiian waters and the western tropical Pacific Ocean: Project summary. SOEST 00-01, JIMAR Contribution 00-328.
• Itano, D. 2005. A handbook for the identification of yellowfin and bigeye tunas in fresh condition (v2). Western and Central Fisheries Commission. Fishing Technology Working Group. December 2005. 25 p.
• Langley, A, M Herrera, J-P Hallier & J Million. 2009. Stock assessment of yellowfin tuna in the Indian Ocean using MULTIFAN-CL. Indian Ocean Tuna Commission, 11th Session of the Working Party on Tropical Tunas, 10-23 October 2009, Kenya. Working paper 10. 66p.
• Langley, A, S Hoyle, & J Hampton. 2011. Stock assessment of yellowfin tuna in the Western Central Pacific Ocean. Western & Central Pacific Fisheries Commission 7th Scientific Committee Regular Session, 9-17 August 2011, Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia, Paper SA-WP-03 (Revision 1-03 August 2011). 135 p.
• Lehodey, P & Leroy, B. 1999. Age and growth of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) from the Western and Central Pacific Ocean as indicated by daily growth increments and tagging data. Working Paper YFT-2, Standing Committee on Tuna and Billfish, 16-23 June, 1999, Tahiti.
• Lehodey, P, J Hampton, RW Brill, S Nicol, I Senina, B Calmettes, HO Pörtner, L Bopp, T Ilyina, JD Bell, & J Sibert. 2011. Vulnerability of oceanic fisheries in the tropical Pacific to climate change. Pp 433-492, in JD Bell, JE Johnson & AJ Hobday (eds), Vulnerability of Tropical Pacific Fisheries and Aquaculture to Climate Change. Secretariat of the Pacific Community, Noumea, New Caledonia.
• Miyake, MP, P Guillotreau, CH Sun, & G Ishimura. 2010. Recent developments in the tuna industry: stocks, fisheries, management, processing, trade and markets. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper. No.543. Rome, FAO. 125 p.
• Potier, M, F Marsac, V Lucas, R Sabatié, J-P Hallier & F Ménard. 2004. Feeding Partitioning among Tuna Taken in Surface and Mid-water Layers: The Case of Yellowfin (Thunnus albacares) and Bigeye (T. obesus) in the Western Tropical Indian Ocean. Western Indian Ocean Journal of Marine Science 3(1):51-62.
• Reygondeau, G, O Maury, G Beaugrand, JM Fromentin, A Fonteneau & P Cury. 2012. Biogeography of tuna and billfish communities. Journal of Biogeography, 39:114-129.
• Schaefer, K. 1996. Spawning time, frequency, and batch fecundity of yellowfin tuna, Thunnus albacares, near Clipperton Atoll in the eastern Pacific Ocean. Fish. Bull. 94:98-112.
• Schaefer, K. 1998. Reproductive biology of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) in the eastern Pacific Ocean. Inter-Am.Trop. Tuna Comm. Bull. 21:205-221.
• Schaefer, KM. 1999. Comparative study of some morphological features of yellowfin (Thunnus albacares) and bigeye (Thunnus obesus) tunas. Bulletin/Inter.-American Tropical Tuna Commission, 21:491-525.
• Schaefer, KM, DW Fuller, & BA Block. 2011. Movement, behaviour and habitat utilization of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) in the Pacific Ocean off Baja California, Mexico, determined from archival tag data analyses, including unscented Kalman filtering. Fisheries Research 112 (2011): 22-37.
• Sibert, J & J Hampton. 2003. Mobility of tropical tunas and the implications for fisheries management. Marine Policy 27:87-95.
• Sibert, J, J Hampton, P Kleiber & M Maunder. 2006. Biomass, size, and trophic status of top predators in the Pacific Ocean. Science 314:1773-1776.
• Song, LM, Y Zhang, LX Xu, WX Jiang & JQ Wang. 2008. Environmental preferences of longlining for yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) in the tropical high seas of the Indian Ocean. Fisheries Oceanography 17:239-253.
• Sund, PN, M Blackburn M & F Williams. 1981. Tunas and their environment in the Pacific Ocean: A review. Oceanography Marine Biology: An Annual Review 19, 443-512.
• WCPFC (Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission). 2012. Summary Report of the Scientific Committee, the Commission for the Conservation and Management of Highly Migratory Fish Stocks in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean. 7th Regular Session, 9-17 August 2011, Kolonia, Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia. 211p.

COMPILERS, EDITORS

• Quick Facts: Patricia Kailola and Meryl Williams; Updated Feb 2019 by Victoria Jollands
• Sustainability: Meryl Williams and Patricia Kailola; Updated Feb 2019 by Victoria Jollands
• Production: Patricia Kailola, Tarlochan Singh and Meryl Williams
• Supply Chains and Markets: Patricia Kailola, Tarlochan Singh and Meryl Williams
• Environment and Climate: Patricia Kailola, Johann Bell and Meryl Williams
• Biology: Patricia Kailola, Johann Bell and Meryl Williams

INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE FOLLOWING PEOPLE

• John Hampton, Secretariat for the Pacific Community (SPC)
• Johann D. Bell, SPC (Pacific Island consumption patterns, climate change)
• Lindsay Chapman, SPC (Pacific Island consumption patterns)
• Simon Hoyle, SPC
• Peter Williams, SPC
• Peter Nichols, CSIRO, Australia (nutrition)
• Indian Ocean Tuna Commission Secretariat (Indian Ocean material)
• Miguel Herrera (IOTC)
• Fishbase team

REVIEWERS

Drafts of the presentations were reviewed by the following:

• Sustainability - Johann Bell (SPC, Conservation International - CI)
• Production - Johann Bell (SPC, CI), Peter Williams (SPC), Miguel Herrera (IOTC, Organizacion de Productores Asociados de Grandes Atuneros Congeladores - OPAGAC)
• Supply Chains and Markets - Antony Lewis, Mike McCoy, Shri Sreekanth G.B., Peter Nichols (nutrition)
• Environment and Climate - Johann Bell (SPC, CI), Ming-An Lee (IO climate)
• Biology - Johann Bell (SPC, CI), Simon Nicol (SPC), Bruno Leroy (SPC)

PHOTOGRAPHS AND GRAPHICS

• Secretariat for the Pacific Community
• Johann Bell, SPC
• International Seafood Sustainability Foundation (ISSF)
• David Itano, ISSF, personal
• Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Fisheries and Aquaculture Department (figures, maps)
• Antony Lewis
• Shri Sreekanth G.B.
• Warren Scomi, SPC
• Gabriel Reygondeau, Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement (IRD)
• Wikimedia Commons

FUNDING AND SUPPORT

Funding to prepare the yellowfin tuna profiles was provided by the International Seafood Sustainability Foundation (iss-foundation.org), the Asian Fisheries Society (www.asianfisheriessociety.org), and the personal time of Johann Bell. In-kind support has been provided by the host organizations of those who provided information and reviewed drafts.